Tease of the Month, June 2010

by **Indigo** » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:36 pm

Hi Folks! As you've most likely noticed, the TOTM has been delayed, due to some illness I've been fighting with. Thanks for everybodies patience, and without further ado- here's the TOTM!
You can vote until July 26th.

Nominated Teases

Your Investigation Begins - Cactusman

Miss Kimmy's Sissy Whore - galvanisedpenguin

Gina wants you to suffer - dickletdrippy

Your Dick Makes You Pay - Ballerina

Patty's Tutorial on How to Train a Man - Peckersnot

As always, we hope that the members will take the time to recognize the Authors whose hard work and talent go to making the site better for all of us! Thanks, and good luck!

Rules:
The nominations are the 5 highest rated teases. If two webteases have the same rating, the webtease which have more votes will participate.

If two or more teases have the same amount of votes after the voting period, a second voting will happen. Only the teases with the most votes can participate and the voting time is decreased to two days, to grant the winner's tease as much as possible time on our front page.

Only one tease per author can participate. We'll take only the best rated tease for authors with multiple qualifying teases.

The voting system should be separated from the webtease itself. Hence webteases encouraging a vote for the TOTM to manipulate the system will not be nominated at the end of the month regardless of ranking.

The prize is a special user rank in our forum and a mark in the "Browse Teases" area.

Winner's Name

If your tease is nominated, please don't make any changes until the voting period is over, or you risk being disqualified.

If any issues happen that are not clarified by these rules the team of Milovana has the right and the the duty to adjust the rules for finding the best and most fair solution to overcome this issue. There is no way for participants to affect a decision by the team, except the team.

by **cactusman** » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:22 pm

It's an honor to be nominated for this.

Sorry to hear you have been sick, Indy. Hope you are feeling or start to feel better soon.

by **Dickletdrippy** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:26 am

Very pleased to be nominated :-D

by **Cider** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:57 am

There was more than one i liked on this list...too bad only one can win! best of luck to everyone

by **peckersnot** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:16 pm

Hi There!

I am very happy to be nominated for the TOTM as well.

This was the third tease in my "Patty Heaton" trilogy. -In fact, it's the third tease I've ever done.

(I'm a real beginner here.)

Best of luck to all.

-Peckersnot

by **storydejour** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:08 pm

Peckersnot, your tease was awesome. If I had 10 votes, five of them would have been for yours.

by **peckersnot** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:28 pm

Thanks so much for your kind words.

I appreciate -and need- the encouragement.

by **wonderbo** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:55 pm

Several really great teases to choose from for June. This is probably one of the tougher choices I've made for TOTM!

by **wonderbo** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:21 pm

I'm guessing that the three second place teases (Your Investigation Begins, Gina Wants You to Suffer, and Your Dick Makes You Pay) are leaching votes from each other. In other words, if only one of those three teases were in the running that tease would win hands down...but since they are competing against each other, none of them can win. Could the voting system be altered to allow voters to rank the contestants instead of just having to vote for one?

by **storydejour** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:43 pm

wonderbo wrote:I'm guessing that the three second place teases (Your Investigation Begins, Gina Wants You to Suffer, and Your Dick Makes You Pay) are leaching votes from each other. In other words, if only one of those three teases were in the running that tease would win hands down...but since they are competing against each other, none of them can win. Could the voting system be altered to allow voters to rank the contestants instead of just having to vote for one?

Initially I thought "that's just the way it goes, and it should be honor enough just to be nominated" but you know, I think Wonderbo is right. Different sorts of teases appeal to different people, and I think the one currently in the lead is sufficiently different from the others as to garner all the votes from certain blocs, while all four of the others, not just the three vying for second place, are having to split their votes. So ironically, the majority of people voting may not have found the first place winner appealing.

I know it would probably just make things more complicated, I just felt like bitching about something.

Hopefully, everyone understands I mean no offense to the leader, since it's still obviously better than any of my teases, lol...

by **wonderbo** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:48 pm

storydejour wrote:I know it would probably just make things more complicated, I just felt like bitching about something.

LoL

by **Dickletdrippy** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:17 am

My tease is clearly the best. :closedeyes:

by **storydejour** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:43 am

So, Peckersnot, did you arrange for more federal funding for Acorn or what?

by **wonderbo** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:29 pm

storydejour wrote:So, Peckersnot, did you arrange for more federal funding for Acorn or what?

Yeah, that was weird...two votes...then it shot ahead of everyone.

by **seraph0x** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:51 pm

I investigated the issue and the vote was indeed manipulated. Somebody spent 2010-07-24 17:07:10 - 23:33:08 to create 23 new accounts and then voting for this tease. Now, I don't have any proof whether this was done with the consent of the author or not, so I won't disqualify this time. I've added some new logging routines, so if the individual votes again, we'll know more.

The fraudulent votes have been subtracted, the accounts deleted and the corresponding email addresses banned. So if it indeed took that person six hours (with breaks) to do, perhaps they can take comfort in the fact that they wasted only about five minutes of my time.

When I started the TOTM I was worried that people wouldn't want it enough, since there is no trophy, no prize money, etc. Now it seems, there are some who want it too much. :closedeyes:

I'd just like you all to consider that a moral award like the TOTM can only be won morally. If you'd cheat to get a Ferrari, fine, but why on earth would you cheat to get something where the only value is your knowledge that you have genuinely earned it. :huh:

Finally I want to say again that right now, there is some chance the manipulation was not done by the author, but rather, by enemies of the author in order to get him or her disqualified. Nobody should ever be punished on suspicion alone.